|
Post by outofthegloom on Feb 10, 2011 19:59:45 GMT
To Falkirk for one month ( source). Would have been nice to have got him back in January. But if Rangers are only prepared to loan him for four weeks now, assume that would have been a non-starter.
|
|
|
Post by Lone Gunman on Feb 10, 2011 20:08:59 GMT
Never though perry was all that to be fair. Opportunities were limited I guess but I don't recall him really setting the world alight at any point.
|
|
|
Post by ox4eva on Feb 11, 2011 8:50:57 GMT
To Falkirk for one month ( source). Would have been nice to have got him back in January. But if Rangers are only prepared to loan him for four weeks now, assume that would have been a non-starter. Rangers were happy to loan him for longer, it was Falkirk that requested the time period
|
|
|
Post by rollsy on Feb 11, 2011 13:48:44 GMT
He didn't play a great deal. But i was happy to let him go back last Jan. I thought he looked very poor in all his games, and was rightly so behind Foster, Creighton and Day in the pecking order.
|
|