|
Post by dontwannagohome (banned) on Feb 6, 2011 13:40:43 GMT
Midson got to do to get a game ffs. Wilder is p!ssing me off not starting him or even bringing him on grrrrrrrrrrrrr. He scored a hattrick at Torquay. Also we average over 2 points a game that Midson has started come on LORD Wilder sort it out man.
|
|
|
Post by junior1 on Feb 6, 2011 13:41:22 GMT
Who you want dropped for him?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2011 13:44:11 GMT
OH! MY! GOD! Damn that bastard Wilder playing his best and most consistent strikers! What we need is a little less end product in the side.
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Feb 6, 2011 14:07:42 GMT
get a grip. he works hard but is nowhere near the form of any of the other 3
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2011 14:14:56 GMT
I'm a fan of Midson but i don't think he should be starting as the current 3 are much better IMO. I do think he could have made an impact coming off the bench in a few games but potter and hackney are also great impact subs. Tough choice but i think we should use him in more physical games if anything.
|
|
|
Post by dontwannagohome (banned) on Feb 6, 2011 17:09:19 GMT
Maclean what has he done for us? Ummm Yeah that's what i thought jack crap. Midson scored more than him this season for us, Drop him play Midson ffs.
|
|
|
Post by irishterrier on Feb 6, 2011 17:23:27 GMT
now i am a midson fan ,,, ok the others are doing well ,but to not bring him on when were not scoreing ,ie southend and gillingham is a JOKE! what has he got to do chris? ??
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2011 17:45:38 GMT
Me, I'm an Oxford fan. Midson doesn't look as good an option coming off the bench or starting as what we are using for me. Bar his hat-trick at Torquay (which kept him in the squad for a number of games) he just simply hasn't done enough to warrant the adoration he gets.
We go one game without a goal and the Midson brigade crawl out of the woodwork. Here's an idea; how about you guys support the team (whoever is in it) rather than looking for an opportunity to have a dig at the club and Wilder when it's just not there?
|
|
|
Post by behindthegoal on Feb 6, 2011 18:01:44 GMT
Me, I'm an Oxford fan. Midson doesn't look as good an option coming off the bench or starting as what we are using for me. Bar his hat-trick at Torquay (which kept him in the squad for a number of games) he just simply hasn't done enough to warrant the adoration he gets. We go one game without a goal and the Midson brigade crawl out of the woodwork. Here's an idea; how about you guys support the team (whoever is in it) rather than looking for an opportunity to have a dig at the club and Wilder when it's just not there? How can he do 'enough'' when he isn't in the starting squad of every game ? He's been pushed out from when he first came here
|
|
|
Post by hairy on Feb 6, 2011 18:04:41 GMT
now i am a midson fan ,,, ok the others are doing well ,but to not bring him on when were not scoreing ,ie southend and gillingham is a JOKE! what has he got to do chris? ?? We did score against Southend and we got a point away at Gillingham. Is Midson the answer to every problem at the club? Everytime we have a slight blip are we going to have to listen to you lot bang on about Midson?
|
|
|
Post by longliveclarkey on Feb 6, 2011 18:07:23 GMT
Maclean what has he done for us? Ummm Yeah that's what i thought jack crap. Midson scored more than him this season for us, Drop him play Midson ffs. Yeah, I mean it's not like he's our assist leader and his introduction to the side within a couple of games catalysed us to get away from relegation form or anything. Oh hang on...
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Feb 6, 2011 18:52:19 GMT
Maclean what has he done for us? Ummm Yeah that's what i thought jack crap. Midson scored more than him this season for us, Drop him play Midson ffs. what did the romans ever do for us?
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Feb 6, 2011 19:01:13 GMT
if midson is so good why did no teams come in for him at least on loan knowing that he would have been very cheap if not free. simple cos as hard as he works he's never going to score as many as beano or craddock. and doesnt hold the ball and flick on as well as McLean
|
|
|
Post by irishterrier on Feb 6, 2011 19:20:59 GMT
now i am a midson fan ,,, ok the others are doing well ,but to not bring him on when were not scoreing ,ie southend and gillingham is a JOKE! what has he got to do chris? ?? We did score against Southend and we got a point away at Gillingham. Is Midson the answer to every problem at the club? Everytime we have a slight blip are we going to have to listen to you lot bang on about Midson? bang bang!
|
|
|
Post by followtheox (the original) on Feb 6, 2011 19:28:49 GMT
now i am a midson fan ,,, ok the others are doing well ,but to not bring him on when were not scoreing ,ie southend and gillingham is a JOKE! what has he got to do chris? ?? We did score against Southend and we got a point away at Gillingham. Is Midson the answer to every problem at the club? Everytime we have a slight blip are we going to have to listen to you lot bang on about Midson? Midson should play right back in Batts absence or he should come in for Clark in goal or he should come in for Wright at center back. We should also use him as our defence coach and he should have been guarding our Ox/Bull so it would not have been sprayed pink.
|
|
|
Post by followtheox (the original) on Feb 6, 2011 19:30:04 GMT
Also we average over 2 points a game that Midson has started come on LORD Wilder sort it out man. What does this prove?
|
|
|
Post by moobs on Feb 6, 2011 21:37:45 GMT
Also we average over 2 points a game that Midson has started come on LORD Wilder sort it out man. What does this prove? We'd have got 2 points at Gillingham instead of 1 Isn't that obvious?
|
|
|
Post by followtheox (the original) on Feb 6, 2011 21:43:45 GMT
We'd have got 2 points at Gillingham instead of 1 Isn't that obvious? You are either not the brightest tool in the box but i guess that is not your fault or you are a urine extractor can't tell which. NO it does not prove that and as you know you can't get two points in a game.
|
|
|
Post by moobs on Feb 6, 2011 21:49:22 GMT
We'd have got 2 points at Gillingham instead of 1 Isn't that obvious? You are either not the brightest tool in the box but i guess that is not your fault or you are a urine extractor can't tell which. NO it does not prove that and as you know you can't get two points in a game. ;D I thought you'd be one of the last people i'd whoosh.. ;D
|
|
|
Post by followtheox (the original) on Feb 6, 2011 21:51:00 GMT
You are either not the brightest tool in the box but i guess that is not your fault or you are a urine extractor can't tell which. NO it does not prove that and as you know you can't get two points in a game. ;D I thought you'd be one of the last people i'd whoosh.. ;D To be fair your post about Poland made me think i was getting whooshed but you never know on these boards!
|
|
|
Post by improvox on Feb 6, 2011 22:22:29 GMT
Maclean what has he done for us? Ummm Yeah that's what i thought jack crap. Midson scored more than him this season for us, Drop him play Midson ffs. Really? Do you judge forwards purely on their goals per game ratio? Watch Maclean without your Midson-tinted specs on. He links the play like no other player in our squad, he spots passes brilliant and is so creative. The way he drops deep to be the link between midfield and strikers is done so well it is clear that he is a class apart from most players in this league.
|
|
|
Post by browny on Feb 6, 2011 22:50:04 GMT
Well said, you really have to wonder what on earth goes through some of the small minds here.
Midson for MaClean is without doubt the funniest swap I have seen so far. As Improvox says MaClean plays a role Midson simply could not play. Only option is Midson for Beano and I cannot see ANYONE voting for that one
Midson has done well at times but for me at this point he is not a solution
|
|
|
Post by moobs on Feb 7, 2011 9:12:17 GMT
Well said, you really have to wonder what on earth goes through some of the small minds here. Midson for MaClean is without doubt the funniest swap I have seen so far. As Improvox says MaClean plays a role Midson simply could not play. Only option is Midson for Beano and I cannot see ANYONE voting for that one Midson has done well at times but for me at this point he is not a solution It's not always who is the better player but who would be more effective. If we're gonna hoof all day Midson might be a better option
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2011 9:39:50 GMT
Well said, you really have to wonder what on earth goes through some of the small minds here. Midson for MaClean is without doubt the funniest swap I have seen so far. As Improvox says MaClean plays a role Midson simply could not play. Only option is Midson for Beano and I cannot see ANYONE voting for that one Midson has done well at times but for me at this point he is not a solution It's not always who is the better player but who would be more effective. If we're gonna hoof all day Midson might be a better option What makes you think all we do is hoof? Oh yeah, sorry I forgot you've been to a game now, played in difficult conditions and have based all your opinions on that. FYI Since the turn of the new year (Southend excluded) we've played slick, passing football, worked the ball around teams, broken them down using guile and skill when they've looked to shut up shop and general at least tried to play football (sometimes too much much like your beloved Arsenal). MacLean is a MAJOR part in that and in certain games this season (particularly Bradford) you could see the other players relishing playing with him. Well most could see it, other just decide he's not good enough based on his goals to games ratio.
|
|
|
Post by Si Bradbury on Feb 7, 2011 16:24:03 GMT
Appreciate that football is a game of opinions but I just cannot understand why anyone would think Midson is better than MacLean, Constable and Craddock. For that sole reason, he doesn't deserve to be in the team.
He was sent out on loan, he came back and most thought he was on his way out again, he got selected and did exceptionally well and bagged a hat-trick. As a result he couldn't really be dropped so was started at Aldershot. He did absolutely nothing and was rightly substituted by Beano who took his chance and helped win the game.
Since then, the front three have done well. The side is different class with MacLean in it and other than a quiet performance at Gillingham and a quiet home game recently, this man is one of the main reasons for our upturn in form. He is head and shoulders above anything else we have at this football club. No debate in my opinion.
Midson probably understands that one performance does not entitle you to some extended stay in the team when you don't deliver on a regular basis. He needs to make sure he takes his chances because he didn't at Aldershot.
|
|
|
Post by dontwannagohome (banned) on Feb 7, 2011 18:25:35 GMT
if midson is so good why did no teams come in for him at least on loan knowing that he would have been very cheap if not free. simple cos as hard as he works he's never going to score as many as beano or craddock. and doesnt hold the ball and flick on as well as McLean So nobody made a loan offer for him then? If you believe what is written in a paper your more of a fool than i thought! FACT people was and still are interested in him! Southend away were 2.1 down Midson would loved to of got one over Southend I'm sure so Wilder brings Potter on, Like i said in another thread he's not good enough no end product very greedy to if you ask me. Midson tracks back hell of a lot. I hope it's not the end for Jack
|
|
|
Post by longliveclarkey on Feb 7, 2011 18:46:20 GMT
if midson is so good why did no teams come in for him at least on loan knowing that he would have been very cheap if not free. simple cos as hard as he works he's never going to score as many as beano or craddock. and doesnt hold the ball and flick on as well as McLean So nobody made a loan offer for him then? If you believe what is written in a paper your more of a fool than i thought! FACT people was and still are interested in him! Southend away were 2.1 down Midson would loved to of got one over Southend I'm sure so Wilder brings Potter on, Like i said in another thread he's not good enough no end product very greedy to if you ask me. Midson tracks back hell of a lot. I hope it's not the end for Jack So, contrary to him you believe what isn't written in a paper? I don't see your point. Newspapers don't categorically lie often, so much as twist the facts to suit their own agenda, and unless they have an anti-midson agenda I don't see why they would lie about that. This is all assuming of course that he's actually getting his information from a single paper and nothing else. Where do you source your facts? Midson has never made an impact from the subs bench, he's not that kind of player. Potter does, and you may have your opinion but most people would agree Potter is capable of at the very least adding energy to a team, if not turning a game. Midson is a consistent player who goes about his job without being spectacular. Take away the names, who would you rather bring on as a substitute? And why would you want a tracking back player when you're a goal down and looking to get back into the game? The club is more important than Jack Midson, as much as I like him. If he leaves the club and I don't really see why he should, he looks like first choice back-up, then it'll be the loss of a player who is good and likeable but not as good as the 3 of those who play ahead of him as starters. It's no crying shame, although I might be slightly disappointed.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2011 18:47:22 GMT
"people WERE and still are"
Make up your mind, should he start or come off the bench? How about the games where he came off the bench and did nothing? Would Alfie have been a better option then? Hindsight is a great thing isn't it?
What a strange fascination you have. Support the team, not the player.
|
|
|
Post by basingstokeox on Feb 7, 2011 18:59:09 GMT
thought he would have been brought on at Southend as been on loan there and knew the players well and had a point to prove??
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Feb 7, 2011 19:02:39 GMT
didn't read it in a paper , it's a direct comment from wilder " No-one came in for any if our players." unless of course he's lying as well just to keep midson. and why not the fascination with other players not making the team like Payne . midson will not get a long term start under wilder as long as the other three are fit .
|
|