|
Post by osleroad on Nov 8, 2017 19:45:08 GMT
No post or pre match player interviews over last week ..reflecting on the indefensible perhaps??
|
|
|
Post by Paul Cannell on Nov 8, 2017 20:22:45 GMT
Tiger took the microphone. I reckon.
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Nov 8, 2017 20:25:17 GMT
Tiger took the microphone. I reckon. The asset stripping begins
|
|
|
Post by ox4eva on Nov 8, 2017 22:29:44 GMT
Waiting for some oriental chap stating that we don't need to own the ground to be successful...
|
|
|
Post by uptheus on Nov 8, 2017 22:55:10 GMT
Well whoever it turns out to be, at least we know it's going to be more beneficial for the club than the Juan Satori option.
|
|
|
Post by m on Nov 9, 2017 6:57:09 GMT
Well whoever it turns out to be, at least we know it's going to be more beneficial for the club than the Juan Satori option. Why do you say that?
|
|
|
Post by londonroader on Nov 9, 2017 7:26:22 GMT
Well whoever it turns out to be, at least we know it's going to be more beneficial for the club than the Juan Satori option. Why do you say that? Because chas told him too
|
|
|
Post by makv on Nov 9, 2017 8:37:26 GMT
Well whoever it turns out to be, at least we know it's going to be more beneficial for the club than the Juan Satori option. Why do you say that? Because last time, when he didn’t sell, DE said it wasn’t in the “interests of the football club”. Ergo, if he now does sell…
|
|
|
Post by uptheus on Nov 9, 2017 19:49:41 GMT
Well whoever it turns out to be, at least we know it's going to be more beneficial for the club than the Juan Satori option. Why do you say that? Because Darryl said that he wouldn't do a deal that wasn't right for the club, so on that assumption why would he do a deal with the Thai consortium?
|
|
|
Post by m on Nov 10, 2017 8:37:12 GMT
Because Darryl said that he wouldn't do a deal that wasn't right for the club, so on that assumption why would he do a deal with the Thai consortium? Yeah, got it now. Sorry, a bit slow on the uptake there!
|
|
|
Post by toucan on Nov 10, 2017 9:25:31 GMT
Because Darryl said that he wouldn't do a deal that wasn't right for the club, so on that assumption why would he do a deal with the Thai consortium? Substitute the words ' right for the club ' for ' right for me 'and you will get a more accurate idea. Add on the word 'financially' at the end and you probably hit the nail bang square on the head.......just my thoughts.
|
|
|
Post by mcf86 on Nov 10, 2017 10:33:49 GMT
Whatever Is or isn't happening 'behind the scenes' it's taking a long time and a long period of silence from DE, which to me means the more likely hood that -there IS progress being made! No? Looking further, optimistically, it's taking a long time because the proposed purchase of the stadium IS part of the long and protracted negotiations. Just wish one way or the other a deal is struck, and soon.
|
|
|
Post by uptheus on Nov 10, 2017 11:08:46 GMT
Because Darryl said that he wouldn't do a deal that wasn't right for the club, so on that assumption why would he do a deal with the Thai consortium? Substitute the words ' right for the club ' for ' right for me 'and you will get a more accurate idea. Add on the word 'financially' at the end and you probably hit the nail bang square on the head.......just my thoughts. I couldn't disagree with you!
|
|
|
Post by toucan on Nov 10, 2017 14:58:53 GMT
Substitute the words ' right for the club ' for ' right for me 'and you will get a more accurate idea. Add on the word 'financially' at the end and you probably hit the nail bang square on the head.......just my thoughts. I couldn't disagree with you! Venture capitalists usually have one aim in business , maybe his is different or he has ceased to be a venture capitalist.
|
|
|
Post by londonroader on Nov 10, 2017 18:04:05 GMT
I couldn't disagree with you! Venture capitalists usually have one aim in business , maybe his is different or he has ceased to be a venture capitalist. As he's proved up to date....
|
|