|
Post by oxymoron on Jan 22, 2012 15:58:22 GMT
For the second week running, we have been served up the same fare; boring, insipid, dull, factually dubious.
When posters counter his arguments, he has no plan B. His failure to break down other posters defence of Wilder is shameful. He simply cannot cultivate or produce a winning argument relevant to tactics and team choice. God help him if he ever decides to debate with experienced posters when he struggles to make a constructive response to people whose opinions he simply disregards.
He has taken this approach as far as he can. It is time for him to go, while there is still a chance to save face, otherwise this forum will continue its slide down the rankings. ESB needs to consider his options for next week……..
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2012 16:00:37 GMT
Agreed.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Jan 22, 2012 16:07:08 GMT
Seeing as we drew a Must Win game that's it now. He's proved his point and doesn't need to post anymore.
|
|
|
Post by yellowhoods on Jan 22, 2012 16:13:58 GMT
For the second week running, we have been served up the same fare; boring, insipid, dull, factually dubious. When posters counter his arguments, he has no plan B. His failure to break down other posters defence of Wilder is shameful. He simply cannot cultivate or produce a winning argument relevant to tactics and team choice. God help him if he ever decides to debate with experienced posters when he struggles to make a constructive response to people whose opinions he simply disregards. He has taken this approach as far as he can. It is time for him to go, while there is still a chance to save face, otherwise this forum will continue its slide down the rankings. ESB needs to consider his options for next week…….. Run along, you disciple you.
|
|
|
Post by notaswindonfan on Jan 22, 2012 16:20:35 GMT
i think we need too review our options at the end of the season, its far to early to make knee jerk reaction to events that may or may not come to be. there is a chance it could be turned around, although time is starting to run out.
|
|
|
Post by higgy on Jan 22, 2012 16:31:54 GMT
Like the Ken situation, I would not be in favour of banning Mazza just because many find his views repetitive, tedious and designed to get a reaction. I do agree that he is all these things, but that's not a reason to ban the irksome one. Just ignore him. No replies and it will make him look like even more of the sad fecker that many of you believe him to be. ;-)
|
|
|
Post by oxfordkne on Jan 22, 2012 16:59:09 GMT
The current team of Marrazonox and moobs is not working, short on ideas and like Kassam obviously have their own agenda. A protest meeting should be held at the next home match unless they call a forum to explain their position and answer supporters questions in an open and transparent manner.
|
|
|
Post by helsinkiyellow on Jan 22, 2012 17:08:08 GMT
If Marrazonox gets his marching orders, will his No. 2 PaulAyres be expected to follow him out of the door?
|
|
|
Post by hablopicasso on Jan 22, 2012 17:11:05 GMT
He's a joke, not a real person, a wind-up merchant. I don't read and will always ignore his posts, and those of people like Ken who are too ridiculous to bother with.
|
|
|
Post by higgy on Jan 22, 2012 17:15:34 GMT
Just seen a nice personal message from Mazza in my inbox correcting my spelling in a thread I contributed to and calling me a c*nt, whatever that is? Do we have words including this symbol in the English language?
|
|
|
Post by junior1 on Jan 22, 2012 17:18:06 GMT
If Marrazonox gets his marching orders, will his No. 2 PaulAyres be expected to follow him out of the door? Will ESB give them the dreaded vote of confidence!
|
|
|
Post by yellowhoods on Jan 22, 2012 19:32:37 GMT
Just seen a nice personal message from Mazza in my inbox correcting my spelling in a thread I contributed to and calling me a c*nt, whatever that is? Do we have words including this symbol in the English language? Yep, I've had several threatening PMs from Maz. He denies it, which is rather silly since I still have them!
|
|
|
Post by yellowscooby on Jan 22, 2012 19:54:25 GMT
this is a 'must post' thread or the forum is over
|
|
|
Post by mazarronox (banned) on Jan 22, 2012 20:11:51 GMT
The trouble is people simply do not like to hear an alternative opinion to their own, that is why you all resort to name calling, any defensive posts to deflect away from your views that wilder cannot be wrong in any way.
This is nailed on by the fact that you have mentioned Paul Ayres, who just coincidentally has a similar view to mine.
People should also be aware those of you that are claiming to have recieved messages from me originally sent Me threatening messages. Now you ask yourselves how you would have reacted if you had recieved a threatening message. I have reported one, that went far too far, threatening violence. Funnily enough though, that was the only post he sent me, and wouldn't reply.
If you have your own point of view, why not respond to mine, in your protection of wilder, rather than getting personal.
Oh and the other own goal, is that by the person whoever started this thread.
You condem me for responding using words like "Desciples", which I haven't for some time, yet have any of you bothered to look at the title of the thread, does it really get any more childish than that?
Junior, you do surprise me, as I have always respected your posts, yet you seem to falling in line with this bunch of lemmings, rather than having your normal balanced point of view.
|
|
|
Post by yellowhoods on Jan 22, 2012 20:16:30 GMT
I did not threaten you. You are a liar. Produce the PMs I sent to you, and I will produce those you sent me.
|
|
|
Post by junior1 on Jan 22, 2012 20:20:44 GMT
The trouble is people simply do not like to hear an alternative opinion to their own, that is why you all resort to name calling, any defensive posts to deflect away from your views that wilder cannot be wrong in any way. This is nailed on by the fact that you have mentioned Paul Ayres, who just coincidentally has a similar view to mine. People should also be aware those of you that are claiming to have recieved messages from me originally sent Me threatening messages.Now you ask yourselves how you would have reacted if you had recieved a threatening message. I have reported one, that went far too far, threatening violence. Funnily enough though, that was the only post he sent me, and wouldn't reply. If you have your own point of view, why not respond to mine, in your protection of wilder, rather than getting personal. Oh and the other own goal, is that by the person whoever started this thread. You condem me for responding using words like "Desciples", which I haven't for some time, yet have any of you bothered to look at the title of the thread, does it really get any more childish than that? Junior, you do surprise me, as I have always respected your posts, yet you seem to falling in line with this bunch of lemmings, rather than having your normal balanced point of view. Was just going along with the theme of the thread. Trying to crack a joke. Think nothing of it..
|
|
|
Post by a420outpost on Jan 22, 2012 20:25:45 GMT
I did not threaten you. You are a liar. Produce the PMs I sent to you, and I will produce those you sent me. Come on Mazza, yellowhoods is going to show you his - are you going to show yours? ;D
|
|
|
Post by verbal kint on Jan 22, 2012 20:44:44 GMT
I did not threaten you. You are a liar. Produce the PMs I sent to you, and I will produce those you sent me. Come on Mazza, yellowhoods is going to show you his - are you going to show yours? ;D crikey this is a forum first ... are we about to have a cock off?! Does the most impressive helicopter win?
|
|
|
Post by yellowhoods on Jan 22, 2012 21:07:28 GMT
Come on Mazza, yellowhoods is going to show you his - are you going to show yours? ;D crikey this is a forum first ... are we about to have a cock off?! Does the most impressive helicopter win? I have nothing to be ashamed of.
|
|
|
Post by oxymoron on Jan 22, 2012 21:56:10 GMT
Oh and the other own goal, is that by the person whoever started this thread. You condem me for responding using words like "Desciples", which I haven't for some time, yet have any of you bothered to look at the title of the thread, does it really get any more childish than that? I started the thread Bill. It's called "satire" - a very adult concept in humour. PS - time for a trip to Specsavers if you can see "Disciples" in the opening post - perhaps you were thinking of this one from yesterday - but there again, 24 hours is a long time in football...... edit - link was corrupt, sorted
|
|
|
Post by longliveclarkey on Jan 22, 2012 23:22:51 GMT
The trouble is people simply do not like to hear an alternative opinion to their own, that is why you all resort to name calling, any defensive posts to deflect away from your views that wilder cannot be wrong in any way. This is nailed on by the fact that you have mentioned Paul Ayres, who just coincidentally has a similar view to mine. People should also be aware those of you that are claiming to have recieved messages from me originally sent Me threatening messages.Now you ask yourselves how you would have reacted if you had recieved a threatening message. I have reported one, that went far too far, threatening violence. Funnily enough though, that was the only post he sent me, and wouldn't reply. If you have your own point of view, why not respond to mine, in your protection of wilder, rather than getting personal.Oh and the other own goal, is that by the person whoever started this thread. You condem me for responding using words like "Desciples", which I haven't for some time, yet have any of you bothered to look at the title of the thread, does it really get any more childish than that? Junior, you do surprise me, as I have always respected your posts, yet you seem to falling in line with this bunch of lemmings, rather than having your normal balanced point of view. It's interesting you should say that, given that you've failed to respond to my points on another thread and instead told me to 'calm down dear'. More than slightly hypocritical, especially since I've even replied since then, despite you not having responded to the arguments I was was making for a couple of posts. I'm still awaiting a reply if you're interesting in debate rather than slanging. It's your call.
|
|
|
Post by Yellowbrains on Jan 22, 2012 23:38:44 GMT
Maz: You didn't respond to me on the other thread (no doubt you just missed it) so I thought I'd post this again for your benefit.
But I also have to question the motives of mazarronox, who is all over this board after a bad result but is conspicuously absent after good results. He's quite happy (gleeful, in fact) to pick apart Wilder's tactical failings (and he has made a few frustrating mistakes), but has not once praised him when he's got it right.
Maz, you're totally welcome to your opinion (as you're very keen to tell us all) but why are you only capable of expressing a totally biased, one-eyed view? And why is it that anyone who doesn't want Wilder out is a 'disciple'? Seems strange to make the comparisons to the religiously devout when you are more rigidly fixed to a simplified and unshakeable viewpoint to such an extent that you refuse to see the other side of an argument.
|
|
|
Post by dichio on Jan 23, 2012 1:37:42 GMT
Come on Mazza, yellowhoods is going to show you his - are you going to show yours? ;D crikey this is a forum first ... are we about to have a cock off?! Does the most impressive helicopter win? Nah, everytime Arsenal play Man U we have a cock off.
|
|
|
Post by travisrice on Jan 23, 2012 6:23:47 GMT
thanks for this thread not been able to read the board since the match, not a technical fault. Just on a low and couldn't face it. But this thread and other gallows humor has put a smile on my face.
|
|
|
Post by ox44xp on Jan 23, 2012 10:07:39 GMT
Oh and the other own goal, is that by the person whoever started this thread. You condem me for responding using words like "Desciples", which I haven't for some time, yet have any of you bothered to look at the title of the thread, does it really get any more childish than that? I started the thread Bill. It's called "satire" - a very adult concept in humour. PS - time for a trip to Specsavers if you can see "Disciples" in the opening post - perhaps you were thinking of this one from yesterday - but 24 hours is a long time in football...... Owned !
|
|
|
Post by higgy on Jan 23, 2012 18:10:31 GMT
I did not threaten you. You are a liar. Produce the PMs I sent to you, and I will produce those you sent me. and just for the record i did not threaten him either, or send him any PM's, apart from replying to his, in which I stated I loved him.
|
|
|
Post by Yellow River on Jan 23, 2012 19:07:00 GMT
Recently I also have received an aggresive PM from marzipan with a thinly veiled threat of violence, however I chose to ignore it. It's pathetic when you think about it.
Incidently on Christmas Eve he aslo wrote the following in response to one of my posts which some may have missed as he susequently deleted it.
Dec 24, 2011, 10:08pm, mazarronox wrote:
I've just managed to find out who you really are, and can now certainly understand why people are pretty p*ssed off with you.
Your the cnut that grassed enough to police to get two Oxford lads sent to court.
No wonder Eric has issues with you, and you seem to shaking in your boots about a "hatchet being buried".
Won't be much Xmas spirit shown towards you at AFC Wimbledon me thinks.
|
|
|
Post by concretebob on Jan 23, 2012 19:54:38 GMT
So it's 10PM, it's Christmas Eve. What's Mazarron up to? Sending threats to people they've never met.
Think that kind of sums it up really.
|
|