|
Post by stevegilbert on Oct 3, 2014 11:25:48 GMT
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I have no idea why Man Utd have been brought into this thread, because a) it's about Arsenal and b) it's about the Champions League. These are two topics which do not concern Man Utd fans. 3 threads that have been about Chelsea, Man City, Roma, Arsenal and Galatasaray have been turned into Man U threads. It seems some struggle with talking about other topics away from Man U. What punishment do you think Galatasaray will get for the flairs being thrown onto the pitch?
|
|
|
Post by baldy on Oct 3, 2014 11:58:22 GMT
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I have no idea why Man Utd have been brought into this thread, because a) it's about Arsenal and b) it's about the Champions League. These are two topics which do not concern Man Utd fans. 3 threads that have been about Chelsea, Man City, Roma, Arsenal and Galatasaray have been turned into Man U threads. It seems some struggle with talking about other topics away from Man U. What punishment do you think Galatasaray will get for the flairs being thrown onto the pitch? No punishment whatsoever hopefully. Flares, smoke, raucous fans make atmospheres intimidating and hostile to play in. Unless there is physical violence, for which there is no place for, then long may it continue. Supporters have every right to create frenzied atmospheres in an attempt to put off players. Those players big enough to handle it will sail through, those who are a bit nervous will freeze and buckle under the cauldron of hostility towards them. Turkish fans are among the most fervent around and create unique atmospheres that really ramp up a game. You need that bubbling undercurrent of hatred, its what makes a match special. Look at the atmosphere in our games against Swindon. They're on a knife edge and I say it leave it alone and lets get atmospheres right to the very edge but just staying inside the boundary that borders violence. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Stay legal but only just and then there can be no complaints if what's going on is within the law. Nothing like a match with borderline tackles flying in. 100mph football and a simmering crowd.
|
|
|
Post by Junior on Oct 3, 2014 12:38:21 GMT
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I have no idea why Man Utd have been brought into this thread, because a) it's about Arsenal and b) it's about the Champions League. These are two topics which do not concern Man Utd fans. 3 threads that have been about Chelsea, Man City, Roma, Arsenal and Galatasaray have been turned into Man U threads. It seems some struggle with talking about other topics away from Man U. What punishment do you think Galatasaray will get for the flairs being thrown onto the pitch? Which two posters mentioned Manchester Utd first in this thread. Give you a clue. It wasn't Baldy. Which poster then reignited the Manchester Utd angle by bringing them back up today. Give you another clue, it wasn't Baldy.
|
|
|
Post by Junior on Oct 3, 2014 12:40:12 GMT
3 threads that have been about Chelsea, Man City, Roma, Arsenal and Galatasaray have been turned into Man U threads. It seems some struggle with talking about other topics away from Man U. What punishment do you think Galatasaray will get for the flairs being thrown onto the pitch? No punishment whatsoever hopefully. Flares, smoke, raucous fans make atmospheres intimidating and hostile to play in. Unless there is physical violence, for which there is no place for, then long may it continue. Supporters have every right to create frenzied atmospheres in an attempt to put off players. Those players big enough to handle it will sail through, those who are a bit nervous will freeze and buckle under the cauldron of hostility towards them. Turkish fans are among the most fervent around and create unique atmospheres that really ramp up a game. You need that bubbling undercurrent of hatred, its what makes a match special. Look at the atmosphere in our games against Swindon. They're on a knife edge and I say it leave it alone and lets get atmospheres right to the very edge but just staying inside the boundary that borders violence. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Stay legal but only just and then there can be no complaints if what's going on is within the law. Nothing like a match with borderline tackles flying in. 100mph football and a simmering crowd. And on that I find it ridiculous that Arsenal have been charged by Uefa. @arsenalreport: Arsenal have been charged with "insufficient organisation" by UEFA for failing to prevent away supporters bringing and throwing flares. Uefa have such a vendetta against English clubs it's unbelievable. Suppose it's Arsenal's fault that these seats got damaged?
|
|
|
Post by Junior on Oct 3, 2014 12:47:19 GMT
. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by SteMerritt on Oct 3, 2014 13:42:43 GMT
No punishment whatsoever hopefully. Flares, smoke, raucous fans make atmospheres intimidating and hostile to play in. Unless there is physical violence, for which there is no place for, then long may it continue. Supporters have every right to create frenzied atmospheres in an attempt to put off players. Yeah great idea. Perhaps you could tell that to this kids parents... www.express.co.uk/sport/football/379511/14-year-old-boy-dies-during-football-match-in-Bolivia
|
|
|
Post by gofish on Oct 3, 2014 13:58:45 GMT
3 threads that have been about Chelsea, Man City, Roma, Arsenal and Galatasaray have been turned into Man U threads. It seems some struggle with talking about other topics away from Man U. What punishment do you think Galatasaray will get for the flairs being thrown onto the pitch? No punishment whatsoever hopefully. Flares, smoke, raucous fans make atmospheres intimidating and hostile to play in. Unless there is physical violence, for which there is no place for, then long may it continue. Supporters have every right to create frenzied atmospheres in an attempt to put off players. Those players big enough to handle it will sail through, those who are a bit nervous will freeze and buckle under the cauldron of hostility towards them. Turkish fans are among the most fervent around and create unique atmospheres that really ramp up a game.You need that bubbling undercurrent of hatred, its what makes a match special. Look at the atmosphere in our games against Swindon. They're on a knife edge and I say it leave it alone and lets get atmospheres right to the very edge but just staying inside the boundary that borders violence. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Stay legal but only just and then there can be no complaints if what's going on is within the law. Nothing like a match with borderline tackles flying in. 100mph football and a simmering crowd. Utter bollox
|
|
|
Post by Junior on Oct 3, 2014 14:02:41 GMT
3 threads that have been about Chelsea, Man City, Roma, Arsenal and Galatasaray have been turned into Man U threads. It seems some struggle with talking about other topics away from Man U. What punishment do you think Galatasaray will get for the flairs being thrown onto the pitch? No punishment whatsoever hopefully. Flares, smoke, raucous fans make atmospheres intimidating and hostile to play in. Unless there is physical violence, for which there is no place for, then long may it continue. Supporters have every right to create frenzied atmospheres in an attempt to put off players. Those players big enough to handle it will sail through, those who are a bit nervous will freeze and buckle under the cauldron of hostility towards them. Turkish fans are among the most fervent around and create unique atmospheres that really ramp up a game. You need that bubbling undercurrent of hatred, its what makes a match special. Look at the atmosphere in our games against Swindon. They're on a knife edge and I say it leave it alone and lets get atmospheres right to the very edge but just staying inside the boundary that borders violence. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Stay legal but only just and then there can be no complaints if what's going on is within the law. Nothing like a match with borderline tackles flying in. 100mph football and a simmering crowd. Fully agree apart from the fireworks crackers etc.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2014 14:48:04 GMT
1. Great detail about most of Welbecks misses..... Took his goals well although the defending was non existent. I don't think though that there should be this hysterical clamour every time Welbeck scores a goal. I think he has scored in two appearances. Once at Villa and last night. I think it's five games where he hasn't scored and in those games has missed two one on ones and mis-kicked from two yards out. He's a good player, yes, but I'm in the Louis van Gaal camp - he just doesn't take enough chances. 2. and then you haven't seen much of Welbeck..... Has he started brightly ? I haven't really seen too much of him but know that he has fired blanks in four games out of six. This is why no-one on this forum will ever take you seriously. Mr contradiction. One minute a 50 Million world class player and the next, an OK forward.
|
|
|
Post by gofish on Oct 3, 2014 15:15:50 GMT
You are very probably wasting your time RTO. Mr Baldy and his puppy 'create' rather than 'live' in reality.
|
|
|
Post by mooro on Oct 4, 2014 0:15:14 GMT
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I have no idea why Man Utd have been brought into this thread, because a) it's about Arsenal and b) it's about the Champions League. These are two topics which do not concern Man Utd fans. The link in this thread to Man Utd is, to a large extent, valid, in that the star of the show last night was Danny Welbeck, a player who Utd sold in the summer to the surprise and disappointment to many. I see no reason why that decision cannot be debated as one consequence of the game last night... There is nothing wrong with Man Utd featuring in threads, if the link is reasonable, (...and as Junior has said, it was not he or Baldy that have introduced MU into a large number of the threads that some point fingers at), the problem only comes when the link is tenuous/non-existant and is raised by others, some of whom clearly enjoy doing it deliberately in order to perpetuate the baldy baiting....(and I'm not pointing the finger at you here BTW, just replying to your mail as it closest to the point).. My point from the Man City thread still stands, in that I was glad to see (and enjoyed) Arsenal win as they were playing together as a team, whereas City seemed to be XI individuals trying to win it on their own and only passing to each other as a last resort, which made me glad that they didn't get the win.
|
|
|
Post by Junior on Oct 4, 2014 6:09:30 GMT
Surprised oufcyellows & Reedie haven't been on this thread since...
|
|
|
Post by gofish on Oct 4, 2014 10:58:08 GMT
Surprised oufcyellows & Reedie haven't been on this thread since... And your point is what exactly?
|
|