|
Post by mcf86 on Aug 30, 2017 15:46:03 GMT
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Aug 30, 2017 15:56:32 GMT
Thought it had been agreed the first team are going to Brookes new site
|
|
|
Post by mcf86 on Aug 30, 2017 16:56:59 GMT
Muddy waters, it says similar in the report.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Aug 30, 2017 17:57:34 GMT
Thought it had been agreed the first team are going to Brookes new site Do you ever read anything that is written vaguely without jumping to conclusions? I think the club were 'talking with' Brookes about their training ground but that was it.
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Aug 30, 2017 18:06:35 GMT
Thought it had been agreed the first team are going to Brookes new site Do you ever read anything that is written vaguely without jumping to conclusions? I think the club were 'talking with' Brookes about their training ground but that was it. Oh right mr know it all. So jumping to conclusions is taking what de said in person seriously is it?? THANKYOU I'll await ur apology
|
|
|
Post by Paul Cannell on Aug 30, 2017 18:55:54 GMT
So jumping to conclusions is taking what de said in person seriously is it?? I rather think that has been proven to be the case. Why bring it up now? Why?
|
|
|
Post by makv on Aug 30, 2017 18:58:35 GMT
Odd chap
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Aug 30, 2017 18:58:56 GMT
So jumping to conclusions is taking what de said in person seriously is it?? I rather think that has been proven to be the case. Why bring it up now? Why? Dunno , could just be because it says at the top that where first team sessions will be held has yet to be decided. It wasn't a dig , I just thought it had been decided and was a very good option. More of a question over brilliant journalism from the Oxford Mail again getting key facts wrong
|
|
|
Post by Paul Cannell on Aug 30, 2017 19:05:31 GMT
Yeah. Well I'm tempted to ask MCF where he left his whingers. Probably fly-tipped them to avoid paying the disposal charges.
|
|