|
Post by Yellow River on Aug 7, 2017 19:52:26 GMT
Surprised this hasn't gained more intrigue on here. I’m suprised too! Full article that includes more info in this weeks non league paper apparently! Wonder if anyone know anything else about this... Well I'm intrigued. Moors' had to cancel their opening match of the season due to "safety concerns". Coincidence?
|
|
|
Post by greatunclekip on Aug 7, 2017 20:13:19 GMT
Very very interesting and definite questions for DE to answer.
Something is amiss.
|
|
|
Post by scotters on Aug 7, 2017 20:21:06 GMT
What does the article say?
|
|
|
Post by yellowhammer on Aug 7, 2017 20:44:23 GMT
I’m suprised too! Full article that includes more info in this weeks non league paper apparently! Wonder if anyone know anything else about this... Well I'm intrigued. Moors' had to cancel their opening match of the season due to "safety concerns". Coincidence? what are you thinking the connection is between DE and the game being cancelled then?
|
|
|
Post by Denissmithswig on Aug 7, 2017 20:56:11 GMT
I hope for Eales sake that he hasn't been naive here.
|
|
|
Post by Yellow River on Aug 7, 2017 21:24:17 GMT
Well I'm intrigued. Moors' had to cancel their opening match of the season due to "safety concerns". Coincidence? what are you thinking the connection is between DE and the game being cancelled then? No reason to suspect there is a connection. However I got the impression from the initial report that the "safety concerns" reason for cancellation of the match was not the whole story. . Two odd stories coming out of Solihull Moors within hours of each does raise the eyebrows though.
|
|
|
Post by ryaniobirdio on Aug 7, 2017 21:37:37 GMT
Kelleher has gone on loan there. I suspect there is every chance that they could well become a club that we loan several players per season out to for experience. Perhaps the likes of Napa and Stevens will end up there in the coming weeks.
It's a curious occurance though, on the back of this Oxford City / CPF stuff. Seems our Chairman has got his fingers in a few pies presently.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Cannell on Aug 8, 2017 7:25:15 GMT
All open and above board; only the interests of OUFC at heart, nothing to worry about.
|
|
|
Post by lukehudson on Aug 13, 2017 9:36:14 GMT
Well isn't this interesting.
|
|
|
Post by manorlounger on Aug 13, 2017 9:51:47 GMT
One hand not knowing what the other is doing?
|
|
|
Post by saddletramp on Aug 13, 2017 10:01:18 GMT
So by "refuting Mike Turl's status as the CEO" Is this director saying he isn't the CEO ?
|
|
|
Post by makv on Aug 13, 2017 12:05:04 GMT
So by "refuting Mike Turl's status as the CEO" Is this director saying he isn't the CEO ? Really weird language. I don't think he meant "refute" at all. God knows what he did mean though!
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Aug 13, 2017 17:36:52 GMT
oh. I thought something underhand was supposed to be going on.
|
|
|
Post by yellowoptimist on Aug 13, 2017 17:50:38 GMT
oh. I thought something underhand was supposed to be going on. That will disappoint a few people😉
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Aug 13, 2017 18:07:25 GMT
Will it though ? See what ur both getting at is the point I was making. At the time I said I didn't believe it, I then followed up by saying several time that I thought it had nothing dodgy or fishy about it at all. The point was it was mentioned as it involved the owner of oufc. Now instead of trying to shut down the discussion on it, if it had been spoken about it would have come out that in fact it was Darryl doing a very noble deed and offering financial help and direction to his boyhood team. It would have also put to bed those that started the rumours weeks before that he was trying to take them over.
|
|