|
Post by lambchop on Jun 25, 2017 20:54:53 GMT
Buy young, sell for profit. Play from the back. Retain the ball Down the line In the mixer
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Jun 25, 2017 20:56:09 GMT
Buy young, sell for profit. Play from the back. Retain the ball So not JT then Here's an idea, put more thought into what you say and maybe you would have to say less We're talking about manager, you know lampard ain't going to play right !
|
|
|
Post by fistfullofdollars on Jun 25, 2017 20:58:59 GMT
So not JT then Here's an idea, put more thought into what you say and maybe you would have to say less We're talking about manager, you know lampard ain't going to play right ! Yep, it was the sell for profit bit, and the buy young, as last time I checked you don't buy a manager who is unemployed. what has lampard got to do with it?
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Jun 25, 2017 21:02:59 GMT
We're talking about manager, you know lampard ain't going to play right ! Yep, it was the sell for profit bit, and the buy young, as last time I checked you don't buy a manager who is unemployed. what has lampard got to do with it? This is the post I replied to ]Sensible, but unlikely to materialise. DE will be looking for a relatively inexperienced manager, albeit knowledgeable and well connected, who he can manipulate (in a positive way) and mould to suit his personal beliefs. The current ethos in and around the club must be retained. A proven manager is highly improbable. [/quote] The current favourite is now frank lampard, read the next manager thread, We have only so far been linked with defenders, I make a bad joke that maybe terry would fit better, as he also used to play at Chelsea and was a defender.
|
|
|
Post by grenobleroad on Jun 25, 2017 21:05:50 GMT
Yep, it was the sell for profit bit, and the buy young, as last time I checked you don't buy a manager who is unemployed. what has lampard got to do with it? This is the post I replied to ]Sensible, but unlikely to materialise. DE will be looking for a relatively inexperienced manager, albeit knowledgeable and well connected, who he can manipulate (in a positive way) and mould to suit his personal beliefs. The current ethos in and around the club must be retained. A proven manager is highly improbable. The current favourite is now frank lampard, read the next manager thread, We have only so far been linked with defenders, I make a bad joke that maybe terry would fit better, as he also used to play at Chelsea and was a defender. [/quote] I think you're feeling guilty and back tracking.
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Jun 25, 2017 21:08:08 GMT
Guilty, good one. Try again.
|
|
|
Post by grenobleroad on Jun 25, 2017 21:09:03 GMT
Guilty, good one. Try again. Keep playing dumb then.
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Jun 25, 2017 21:11:56 GMT
I do admire ur defence of anything said about the chairman even when there is nothing more to it than ur overactive imaginations.
Don't remember you being so vocal on the ched Evans thread, when there was what 20/30 pages of talk about his "alleged" offences. Don't remember it getting shut down either
|
|
|
Post by grenobleroad on Jun 25, 2017 21:13:13 GMT
I do admire ur defence of anything said about the chairman even when there is nothing though. Don't remember you being so vocal on the ched Evans thread, when there was what 20/30 pages of talk about his "alleged" offences. Wtf has ched Evans got to do with anything?
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Jun 25, 2017 21:15:12 GMT
So it alright to talk about some people's private lives but not others. Where's the line ?
|
|
|
Post by grenobleroad on Jun 25, 2017 21:18:34 GMT
So it alright to talk about some people's private lives but not others So at least we have confirmation what you meant when you mentioned terry.
|
|
|
Post by fistfullofdollars on Jun 25, 2017 21:18:38 GMT
So it alright to talk about some people's private lives but not others But you said you were not going down that path and would avoid the twitter rumours etc, and anyway this was all an innocent post about buying defenders or a manager who was a defender right?!
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Jun 25, 2017 21:19:33 GMT
So it alright to talk about some people's private lives but not others So at least we have confirmation what you meant when you mentioned terry. No but I have worked out that's what ur implying I meant .
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Jun 25, 2017 21:20:47 GMT
So it alright to talk about some people's private lives but not others But you said you were not going down that path and would avoid the twitter rumours etc, and anyway this was all an innocent post about buying defenders or a manager who was a defender right?! Correct, but as u two have got ur knickers in a twist, and mistakenly obviously think that's what I meant could u just for clarity clear up what the difference is
|
|
|
Post by grenobleroad on Jun 25, 2017 21:20:55 GMT
So at least we have confirmation what you meant when you mentioned terry. No but I have worked out that's what ur implying I meant . Bollocks. It's what you meant. Your digs over the last week have been an embarrassment.
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Jun 25, 2017 21:28:01 GMT
What digs are they then? Apart from the questions I've been asking for months that loads of other people are asking. Show me once where I posted anything about any other stuff going on, I've not even put links or screen shot up when I've been asked to.
|
|
|
Post by fistfullofdollars on Jun 25, 2017 21:28:18 GMT
But you said you were not going down that path and would avoid the twitter rumours etc, and anyway this was all an innocent post about buying defenders or a manager who was a defender right?! Correct, but as u two have got ur knickers in a twist, and mistakenly obviously think that's what I meant could u just for clarity clear up what the difference is That doesn't even make sense If you want to engage in adult conversation then do so, but just saying stupid things and pretending you didn't mean them isnt debate, it is a waste of time and demeaning to the subject.
|
|
|
Post by grenobleroad on Jun 25, 2017 21:30:18 GMT
What digs are they then? Apart from the questions I've been asking for months that's loads of other people are asking. Nothing wrong with questions about the football club. It's your digs about his personal life from your mates on Twitter.
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Jun 25, 2017 21:30:45 GMT
Fair enough, so in the meaning of debate why is it ok to have a 30 page discussion on what one person may have done but not another ?
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Jun 25, 2017 21:31:12 GMT
What digs are they then? Apart from the questions I've been asking for months that's loads of other people are asking. Nothing wrong with questions about the football club. It's your digs about his personal life from your mates on Twitter. Of which I've repeated or posted - none
|
|
|
Post by grenobleroad on Jun 25, 2017 21:34:00 GMT
Nothing wrong with questions about the football club. It's your digs about his personal life from your mates on Twitter. Of which I've repeated or posted - none But alluded to regularly. Everyone knows what that are so making immature worded puns is bad form.
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Jun 25, 2017 21:36:21 GMT
Oh not alluded didn't know that was banned as well, a min ago I was having regular digs, now I'm just alluding to someone else's digs. U seem reluctant to answer my question, why is it different to the ched Evans thread where puns, assumptions, abuse and more were ok to be discussed for over 30 pages. Was that not all bad form ? Is it just a respect thing or what?
|
|
|
Post by yellowoptimist on Jun 25, 2017 22:01:18 GMT
Oh not alluded didn't know that was banned as well, a min ago I was having regular digs, now I'm just alluding to someone else's digs. U seem reluctant to answer my question, why is it different to the ched Evans thread where puns, assumptions, abuse and more were ok to be discussed for over 30 pages. Was that not all bad form ? Is it just a respect thing or what? Perhaps because the Evans case was the subject of a public court case and multiple newspaper reports. Simple isn't it !
|
|
|
Post by oufcyellows on Jun 25, 2017 22:20:50 GMT
Fair enough. Thanks for a Responce.
|
|
|
Post by malcolmnl on Jun 26, 2017 4:46:07 GMT
And this is THE END of the fistfullofdollars / oufcyellows debate.
Hope you have both had a good night's sleep.
|
|
|
Post by ox4eva on Jun 26, 2017 19:12:23 GMT
Seen Mapp was on BBC south news, never heard what he said ?
|
|
|
Post by manorlounger on Jun 26, 2017 19:14:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by saddletramp on Jun 26, 2017 19:16:21 GMT
Seen Mapp was on BBC south news, never heard what he said ? www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40407262Beat me to it Manorlounger. Is the lounger part of your name,from the fact that you beat the Germans to the sunbeds ?
|
|
|
Post by ox4eva on Jun 26, 2017 19:38:44 GMT
Thanks gents
|
|
|
Post by scotchegg on Jun 26, 2017 19:40:39 GMT
I see that bastard Eales forced MApp to deny any issues again! We all know that MApp really hated him and couldn't wait to get away.
|
|