|
Post by Mark on Aug 16, 2013 8:40:08 GMT
If YellowVoice want any semblance of normality and debate they will ban the fruitcake. They've already tried to tone down the antiOxvox postings as showing their forum up as a cabal for trolls and people with purely a negative agenda. But now it's the Ken show, being typed from his padded call in Littlemore. He does this, gets more and more hyper, angrier and angrier, hurling out threats left right and centre, whilst trying to keep his "mates" or the moderators onside by saying nice things about them. Then finishing off with a "it's all about the match on Saturday", to try and make people remember we are all Oxford fans. Soon he will get himself banned by Yellowvoice for overstepping the mark too many times (sadly something dear Old Bob was never able to do on Oxvox - it's all traffic you know, good for the forum, blah blah blah), and have to get the Dr to give him some pills to calm down, and then we won't hear from him again until the next reincarnation. Remember this thread anyone? www.yellowsforum.co.uk/thread/8329/willie-ken
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 8:58:20 GMT
Wow! That brings back memories! I'd forgotten how united the forum was against Ken/Karim and his antics. Even Paul "don't ban anyone" Cannell was calling for his head!
I can only think that the YellowVoice mods have not yet been exposed to his full arsenal, and are prepared to put up with his dull, lengthy posts in order to boost numbers. I notice TT has joined YV (as teetee). Can't wait for him and Ken to cross swords. "Don't remind him you're a Muslim, Pike".
|
|
|
Post by Yellow River on Aug 16, 2013 9:09:08 GMT
Following Mr5Co post on the yellow voice forum comparing Mark Sennett to Robert Mugabe has Mr5Co had the decency to publicly apologise yet?
|
|
|
Post by Si Bradbury on Aug 16, 2013 9:50:39 GMT
Ken has had some of his posts deleted on that forum again. It seems to be a bit of a habit at the moment deleting posts. Freedom of speech, peeps.
|
|
|
Post by Yellow River on Aug 16, 2013 10:02:22 GMT
Wow! That brings back memories! I'd forgotten how united the forum was against Ken/Karim and his antics. Even Paul "don't ban anyone" Cannell was calling for his head! I can only think that the YellowVoice mods have not yet been exposed to his full arsenal, and are prepared to put up with his dull, lengthy posts in order to boost numbers. I notice TT has joined YV (as teetee). Can't wait for him and Ken to cross swords. "Don't remind him you're a Muslim, Pike". (PS To YV mods - how about accepting my application to join? I've explained about the existing member at my current IP address. No multi, just a different individual with his own PC under the same roof). Sadly YH it would appear that you have been blackballed, the yellow voice forum is very secretive about who funded/owns/runs it, perhaps the inner clique all have funny handshakes too. As BB says so much for freedom of speech.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 11:35:23 GMT
Ken has had some of his posts deleted on that forum again. It seems to be a bit of a habit at the moment deleting posts. Freedom of speech, peeps. Yep, my IP address is banned, so no-one from this property can even access the YV forum to read it. What happened to "freedom of speech" and "everyone being treated equally on YV"? Apparently I am not welcome on YV (even to read) because I used a naughty word to describe Ken on this forum, and called Bob a "duplicitous tw*t" (which I do regret, but is never-the-less accurate). Perhaps if the YV mods read Slappy's link above they'll understand just what they can expect when Ken gets into full flow. Cheers.
|
|
|
Post by m on Aug 16, 2013 12:07:36 GMT
Just been reading it.
I'd like to make it clear that M (moderator) is not me. (as would he/she no doubt)
|
|
|
Post by Maurice Earp on Aug 16, 2013 12:35:08 GMT
A friends comment on the Yellow Voice forum. The only thing that I have changed is his mates name. "What a load of old guff that yellow voice forum really is, I haven't bothered reading it all to be honest just commments that have been made on Yellows Forum about it, but I looked at one link and what a surprise a thread stared by Mr Self important and everbody get a load of me Mr5co, he is one the biggest idiots I've ever had the misfortune to hear at football (and on the London Road Club coach) he loves the sound of his own voice and you have no choice but listen to everything he said. As for his sidekick Bobsssssss (should be Bobzzzzzzzzz) I have never heard anybody slate on our players so much as him on Duffy he used to go on and on about it all the time, and I remember ***** saying to him on the coach once "shut up and support your team" !! Duffy wasn't great but he wasn't as bad and didn't jusify all the moaning and criticism he got from him. It was always so much better on the coaches when those 2 weren't on there, 5co thinks he's funny too and he's not at all, hes an attention seeker and with him its always "get a load of me everybody". Yellow Voice seems to be a little boys club all with their own agenda who need to get a life. When Ken spoke up at the fans forum everybody groaned so he's hardly mr popular either". Another post from my good mate "just had a quick look at yellow voice forum again, it really is hilarious reading, it must no more than Ken, 5co, and bob plus a few other multis, and friends, there is no way this forum is full of regular oxford fans this is a ken-spiracy (see what I did there) created to deliberately annoy oxvox and anyone associated with it, there is absolutely no football discussion just bitching and copy and pasting of posts form yellows forum , I see my comments you posted have found their way across. so glad that bob and 5co never go on the coach anymore, we had to suffer them up to morecambe 2 seasons ago, i'm surprised people weren't trying to jump out of the emergency exits to get away from them".
|
|
|
Post by Yellow River on Aug 16, 2013 12:41:45 GMT
This was posted by Godalming Yellow on YV
"I thought the moderators of this forum were supposed to be upholding much higher standards, yet Ken here seems to be able to get away with being aggressive and abusive regarding other parties. You have banned others for less. You can't claim to be upholding high standards if you are one sided"
GY makes a very fair point. Mr5Co comparing Mark Sennett to Robert Mugabe is far worse than anything YH has posted. Double standards.
It would appear on YV that all posters are equal but some are more equal than others.
|
|
|
Post by Maurice Earp on Aug 16, 2013 12:55:36 GMT
Just been reading it. I'd like to make it clear that M (moderator) is not me. (as would he/she no doubt) I wonder who M (moderator) is? Its not me (Maurice). Who do we know who has posted on here who has a name beginning with M?
|
|
|
Post by Gary Baldi on Aug 16, 2013 12:56:55 GMT
That thread was epic. It was like watching someone slowly unravel (again) on the internet.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Aug 16, 2013 13:05:05 GMT
Wow! That brings back memories! I'd forgotten how united the forum was against Ken/Karim and his antics. Even Paul "don't ban anyone" Cannell was calling for his head! I can only think that the YellowVoice mods have not yet been exposed to his full arsenal, and are prepared to put up with his dull, lengthy posts in order to boost numbers. I notice TT has joined YV (as teetee). Can't wait for him and Ken to cross swords. "Don't remind him you're a Muslim, Pike". (PS To YV mods - how about accepting my application to join? I've explained about the existing member at my current IP address. No multi, just a different individual with his own PC under the same roof). Did you see TT's avatar before the ban?.
|
|
|
Post by Si Bradbury on Aug 16, 2013 13:11:36 GMT
Yes I thought it was typically bad taste. I assume it was the one of Ken with a Where's Wally hat?
I for some reason find myself defending Ken, I did on this forum and I did on ours, despite his little jabs and jibes. Freedom of Speech extends to Ken too and I do find myself entertained by him. I think he is mis-understood and thinks he is STAN.
|
|
|
Post by upthecowboys on Aug 16, 2013 13:23:15 GMT
Speaking as a lapsed oxvox member, just reading that forum makes me want to re-join oxvox and I will. I didn't renew initially because I didn't think oxvox was going any where. But with the right to bid, the joint effort with yellow army/12 man re fundraising and atmosphere then it is a no brainer. Fair play to those who are being proactive about improving things.
|
|
|
Post by Maurice Earp on Aug 16, 2013 13:30:34 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 14:04:37 GMT
Ha! I'm told Ken rules the YV forum. When admin thought the now banned poster "yellowhoods" was me they were happy for me to join. Once proved to be fake, Ken announces that if the real YH is allowed to join he would leave. Hey presto! My genuine application to join is rejected. I suppose Ken's the equivalent of the regular contributor Dougie on RadOx - good for circulation.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Cannell on Aug 16, 2013 14:09:59 GMT
When asked on the other forum why he was banned from Yellows, Ken said he had no idea. He told how beastly we all were to him about his MS campaign. He's acting as if butter wouldn't melt. That aggressive post shows his true colours. I can get het up, but I've never threatened anyone. If I remember correctly, Ken was banned from this forum after he threatened to come after me and my family. That threat was in response to a rather lame joke I made that insinuated (in what I thought was an obviously satirical way) that he had peadophile tendencies. I say satirical because, although I was clearly trying to wind him up, it was very obvious in my mind that I was joking and that any such imputation seemed laughable rather than offensive. I did it in much the spirit that I would wind up any one behaving in a self important and pompous manner. He's not the first on this forum and I doubt he will be the last; the vast majority have taken the insult in reasonably good spirit and proved themselves to be better people than I implied. For the record, Ken, I had and have no reason to state or imply that you have sexual interest in people under the legal age. I do think that you're a pompous and somewhat mendacious individual, but I doubt that's much of an insight.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 14:15:09 GMT
When asked on the other forum why he was banned from Yellows, Ken said he had no idea. He told how beastly we all were to him about his MS campaign. He's acting as if butter wouldn't melt. That aggressive post shows his true colours. I can get het up, but I've never threatened anyone. If I remember correctly, Ken was banned from this forum after he threatened to come after me and my family. That threat was in response to a rather lame joke I made that insinuated (in what I thought was an obviously satirical way) that he had peadophile tendencies. I say satirical because, although I was clearly trying to wind him up, it was very obvious in my mind that I was joking and that any such imputation seemed laughable rather than offensive. I did it in much the spirit that I would wind up any one behaving in a self important and pompous manner. He's not the first on this forum and I doubt he will be the last; the vast majority have taken the insult in reasonably good spirit and proved themselves to be better people than I implied. For the record, Ken, I had and have no reason to state or imply that you have sexual interest in people under the legal age. I do think that you're a pompous and somewhat mendacious individual, but I doubt that's much of an insight. Well I called Ken a "w*nker" on here the other day which is why I'm banned from YV and, apparently, why ghetto-dwelling, Blackbird-drinking, punchy Ken will not rest until I apologise or he has beaten me to a messy pulp. I'd be more than happy to reconsider my description. If anyone can think of a word that conveys the same meaning as "w*nker" but would be more acceptable, please let me know.
|
|
|
Post by malcolmnl on Aug 16, 2013 14:20:35 GMT
Addictive master Bater?
|
|
|
Post by Paul Cannell on Aug 16, 2013 14:20:38 GMT
I have nothing further to say on this matter.
|
|
|
Post by Yellow River on Aug 16, 2013 14:26:18 GMT
If I remember correctly, Ken was banned from this forum after he threatened to come after me and my family. That threat was in response to a rather lame joke I made that insinuated (in what I thought was an obviously satirical way) that he had peadophile tendencies. I say satirical because, although I was clearly trying to wind him up, it was very obvious in my mind that I was joking and that any such imputation seemed laughable rather than offensive. I did it in much the spirit that I would wind up any one behaving in a self important and pompous manner. He's not the first on this forum and I doubt he will be the last; the vast majority have taken the insult in reasonably good spirit and proved themselves to be better people than I implied. For the record, Ken, I had and have no reason to state or imply that you have sexual interest in people under the legal age. I do think that you're a pompous and somewhat mendacious individual, but I doubt that's much of an insight. Well I called Ken a "w*nker" on here the other day which is why I'm banned from YV and, apparently, why ghetto-dwelling, Blackbird-drinking, punchy Ken will not rest until I apologise or he has beaten me to a messy pulp. I'd be more than happy to reconsider my description. If anyone can think of a word that conveys the same meaning as "w*nker" but would be more acceptable, please let me know. Perhaps you should've compared him to Robert Mugabe, apparently this is a much less serious misdemeanour than calling someone a w*nker.
|
|
|
Post by mcf86 on Aug 16, 2013 14:26:34 GMT
If I remember correctly, Ken was banned from this forum after he threatened to come after me and my family. That threat was in response to a rather lame joke I made that insinuated (in what I thought was an obviously satirical way) that he had peadophile tendencies. I say satirical because, although I was clearly trying to wind him up, it was very obvious in my mind that I was joking and that any such imputation seemed laughable rather than offensive. I did it in much the spirit that I would wind up any one behaving in a self important and pompous manner. He's not the first on this forum and I doubt he will be the last; the vast majority have taken the insult in reasonably good spirit and proved themselves to be better people than I implied. For the record, Ken, I had and have no reason to state or imply that you have sexual interest in people under the legal age. I do think that you're a pompous and somewhat mendacious individual, but I doubt that's much of an insight. Well I called Ken a "w*nker" on here the other day which is why I'm banned from YV and, apparently, why ghetto-dwelling, Blackbird-drinking, punchy Ken will not rest until I apologise or he has beaten me to a messy pulp. I'd be more than happy to reconsider my description. If anyone can think of a word that conveys the same meaning as "w*nker" but would be more acceptable, please let me know.
His claims made me chuckle, sounds just like the 'My dad's bigger than your dad' from the school playground, I wonder why he feels the need to big himself up and fabricate his 'street cred' just to try and intimidate those who don't agree with him? ken, the Leezer?
|
|
|
Post by Maurice Earp on Aug 16, 2013 15:49:15 GMT
Lord knows why I hadn't thought of that - classic
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 16:09:58 GMT
To be fair, most of the contributors on YV seem balanced enough, and the mods appear to be doing a good job. As far as Kenneth is concerned, I'll happily retract my description of Bob as a "duplicitous tw*t". I feel he WAS duplicitous in his comments about OxVox, but the "tw*t" was unnecessary. So you can call the dogs off Ken. I'm not particularly bothered about meeting you or having a drink with you, but life's too short. That said, you are taking the p*ss moaning about others' bad language and inappropriate comments. You were the king of both on this forum, and I get the feeling you're barely keeping it under control on YV. **** Just read your response Kenneth. Consider hatchet buried in respect the particular spat involving you and Bob, but I reserve the right to be critical of your more outlandish behaviour and utterances. My reference to you being "king" doesn't refer to YV. It refers to you being the biggest culprit on here in terms of bad language and threatening behaviour towards the end of your tenure. (You say I've withdrawn the worst of my insults to Bob. Use of the word "tw*t" was in fact my only insult. Use of "duplicitous" and "good f*cking riddance following Bob's resignation from this forum, were valid comments as far as I'm concerned. Let's not pretend anyone's really insulted by a bit of Anglo-Saxon). **** Kenneth - Malc might read your last comments on YV, but I doubt Paul Cannell will. Would you like me to reproduce your last post on here? Up to you. Oh, OK you've deleted them now.
|
|
|
Post by Gary Baldi on Aug 16, 2013 21:24:28 GMT
As for the M moderator. Moobs.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 22:18:45 GMT
MalcolmNL, how about him - must be a candidate.
|
|