|
Post by longliveclarkey on Jan 25, 2011 23:32:41 GMT
I edited my original post because I realised I was wrong. Sorry for not stating that clearly at the time. Bit of a moot point now though, isn't it?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2011 23:32:42 GMT
But he clearly is your favourite, so it is relevant.
|
|
|
Post by longliveclarkey on Jan 25, 2011 23:35:01 GMT
But he clearly is your favourite, so it is relevant. No, it isn't. I say what I think, you say what you think, it's a debate. Simply because he's one of my favourite players doesn't make my opinion of him less relevant. You can argue I watch him more closely because he's my favourite. If you can't find anything wrong with what I'm actually saying then attacking me because of favouritism isn't an argument, it's a fallacy.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2011 23:36:13 GMT
I'm sorry, it's not moot. We were debating something based on what you said, you the denied saying it at all and changed what you said in the hope people wouldn't notice. That's pretty low. Anyway, I've made my point and I'm done now. We've had a great win and a great team performance so I'm going to bugger off and enjoy my evening.
|
|
|
Post by longliveclarkey on Jan 25, 2011 23:40:55 GMT
I'm sorry, it's not moot. We were debating something based on what you said, you the denied saying it at all and changed what you said in the hope people wouldn't notice. That's pretty low. Anyway, I've made my point and I'm done now. We've had a great win and a great team performance so I'm going to bugger off and enjoy my evening. Don't get personal on me. Okay, you want to say I denied saying it. You see it that way. Whatever. Not relevant. If you look at the argument I went on to present it's actually the fact that Clarke saved our defence trouble. That's what I was arguing about. That's why I made the post saying I'm not saying he saved us and changed my original post, because I went 'hang on, I don't actually think that'. Yes, I could have put a post clarifying that's what I had done, but it wasn't relevant to the argument I went on to make, so I didn't do it. I can now see I should have, sorry about that. Error of judgement. Not low. Stop trying to get high and mighty on me, it's an internet forum.
|
|